Swipe the breakdown ›
Weetabix spent just under five thousand pounds on a photograph of baked beans and ended up being discussed in the House of Commons.
On 9 February 2021 the Weetabix account posted a picture of Heinz beans poured over two Weetabix, with a line asking why bread should have all the fun. The country lost its mind. More than six hundred brand accounts piled in, most of them competing to be the funniest rather than the first. It was argued about on Good Morning Britain and This Morning, chewed over by breakfast radio, and it made it into Parliament. Sales rose 15% over the Valentine’s weekend as people went home to find out how bad it really was. It won Best Use of a Small Budget at the Marketing Week Masters that year, which is the most British award ever given.
The temptation is to file this under lightning striking. It was not. Agency Frank had run social listening first and found that “Weetabix ‘n’ tingz” was already a live argument online, and that the weirder the topping, the harder people went at each other about it. So they did not post beans cold. They built a run of pairings and sent Innocent and Marmite out first, as the warm up act, so that by the time the beans walked on there was already a format for everyone else to copy.
That is the part people skip when they retell this. Weetabix did not go viral. Weetabix booked a gig, put two support acts on the bill, and then let six hundred other brands play the main set for nothing.
The bit I keep coming back to is what kind of post it was.
Most brand content is closed. It states something finished and correct. There is a claim, a product, a tidy sign-off, and absolutely nothing for anyone to add. You cannot argue with it, you cannot be funny underneath it, and there is no version of replying to it that makes the replier look good. So nobody does. The reach stops dead at your own follower count and you have paid, in time or in media, to reach an audience that already follows you.
Weetabix posted something unfinished. A serving suggestion with an obvious hole in it, sized precisely so that any other brand with a social manager and a sense of humour could step through and look clever in public. Every one of them got something out of it, a bit of reflected attention for the cost of one good reply, which is exactly why so many of them showed up.
Five thousand pounds bought one photograph. The other six hundred accounts brought the reach, and they brought it free, because they had been handed something to do.
The uncomfortable read across to your own feed is that most of us are still writing the closed kind. Posts that permit exactly one response, which is scrolling past. We measure them, we are disappointed by them, and then we conclude the problem is the algorithm or the budget.
It is usually neither. A post that nobody can answer is not underperforming. It is working exactly as written.
Reach you buy is a cost that stops the day you stop paying. Reach other people bring you is a format, and formats keep running. Weetabix did not buy an audience that morning. It wrote a post with a gap in it and let the rest of the country fill the gap in.